Sign in | Log in

My Italian American Museum

My Italian American Museum

Joseph Sciorra (June 21, 2010)
Joseph Sciorra
Italian immigrant woman, circa 1925. Schmidt-Lorraine Studios, Chicago.

Entering into a conversation with objects.


For several years now I have been buying objects on associated with Italian-American history and culture. My purchases are somewhat eclectic and my collection is by all definitions a mixed bag. I select objects relating to my research interests (a recording by Phil Brito, a religious banne

r, an embroidered commemorative) and my personal aesthetics (a match book cover, a 1955 cookbook). Getting a bargain and beating the bidding competition adds to the objects’ appeal. 

I’ve also obtained a slew of photographs simply because I liked them: a mustachioed man outfitted in festa regalia; an Italian boy in a fascist uniform; a middle-aged woman with a Mona Lisa smile. I find these images beautiful in their own right. I imagine them on a book cover or as an illustration for a future article.

But for every stunning photograph, I’ve also had to purchase numerous mundane snapshots and formal portraits of limited aesthetic worth as part of a cache of images up for bid. I’ve given them away or quietly discarded them. 

Few of these photographs come with any contextual information and when they do it is minimal at best, e.g., “Italian Americans from Chicago and Phoenix” or “family of S. Corsale, a barber in NYC and Phillipsburg, NJ, 1910s-40s.”  The people depicted are the anonymous faces from history’s jetsam. Ultimately, these photographs pose challenging questions concerning collecting and ultimately the role of museums. 

Objects speak to us, they tell us stories, but those narratives are not always apparent. It is we who derive the tale that an object tells. We give it voice, making it speak in an act of interpretative ventriloquism. And doing so is hard work. 

It is one thing for an individual to accumulate objects but quite another when a museum does so. Such institutions have a responsibility not merely to collect artifacts but to enter into a conversation with them on behalf of museum-goers and the historical record. That work involves curators, scholars, and other professionals knowledgeable in the area of interest and, more importantly, museum work itself.  
After the Calandra Institute’s 1999-2000 exhibition, “The Italians of New York,” curated by historian Philip Cannistraro at the New-York Historical Society, I was charged with soliciting people to donate the approximately 360 objects they had originally lent. The Calandra Institute did not have the staff skilled in collections management and archival processing so I successfully wrote a grant to have archivist Nancy Johnson consult with the Institute to develop a strategic plan for the archives. Her final report concluded that “formally accessioning and documenting the Calandra collection is a priority.” This recommendation involved interviewing the objects’ former owners so as to create the narrative the individual artifacts could tell future generations. The Institute’s director at the time, Joseph Scelsa, dismissed the consultant’s conclusions and ultimately ignored them. 
In agreement with the City University of New York, the hundreds of objects collected by the Calandra Institute became the property of New York City’s Italian American Museum, an entity incubated at the Institute where it mounted its first exhibitions. (I curated three of those exhibits as part of my responsibilities at the Calandra; see the list below.)
I have yet to visit the museum—or the five other Italian-American museums in the country (see the list below)—but a recent newspaper article states that the institution has “a frankly hodge-podge cast to the exhibits.” That is a discouraging assessment. It sounds like a step backwards to the cabinets of curiosities from the pre-museum era.

One can not help but wonder if the objects have been encouraged to speak. If so, are their voices strong, clear, and annunciatedor a faint, garbled mummer? Is there anyone there who is receptive to truly listening and properly equipped to engage in dynamic conversation with objects?

DISCLAIMER: Posts published in i-Italy are intended to stimulate a debate in the Italian and Italian-American Community and sometimes deal with controversial issues. The Editors are not responsible for, nor necessarily in agreement with the views presented by individual contributors.
This work may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, without prior written permission.
Questo lavoro non può essere riprodotto, in tutto o in parte, senza permesso scritto.

Excellent post! You hit the

Excellent post! You hit the nail on the head: objects on their own don't tell a story. They need a storyteller, and regrettably, my one visit to the Italian American "Museum" on Mulberry Street confirms the "hodge-podge" description in the Wall Street Journal article. It is truly unfortunate, an embarrassment to the community, a strong and concise spit on the graves of our ancestors.

How can this situation be remedied? When will the Italian American community, with its complex and diverse history have a museum that digs a little deeper than... well, that digs just a little bit! This "Museum" isn't even a weak shadow of the Historical Society exhibit, which did well to scratch more than just the surface. How did that baton get passed to the one-armed, one-legged bandit, and now trampled by mediocrity?

Italian immigrants dug holes for trains, tunnels, roads, and now their soft-fingered descendants think it is enough to put a few photos and artifacts in a display case?!?!

When I went to the Italian American "Museum," I heard the few scraps in there crying out for a story-teller, yet it seems to me that there isn't a single historian, archivist, folklorist, artist, or writer involved with this "institution." It's a complete shame. Can someone shed some more light on this atrocity?

Antonio Villa

There was one interesting

There was one interesting comment after the WSJ article about the "museum" that may shed some light on it:

Ciro Di Donna wrote: Back in March of 2009. I let it be known (thru-various-media) that I was very disappointed in my representative Congressman Gary Ackerman (along with Congressman Jerold Nadler from New York) to hand over $475,000 of our taxpayer's money to "improve and expand" the Italian American Museum in Little Italy whose board is known to run the museum like a private corporation. At the time I suggested through various media that every taxpayer in NYC, State and Federal Representatives let their representatives know that this was a wasteful use of tax payer's money. In my opinion Dr. Joseph Scelso [sic] and Maria Fosco from the Italian American Museum discriminate against those Italian American artists who have no connections, or are rich enough., or a part of their inner-circle.

The following remark was emailed to me by a prominent Italian American (whom I cannot name to protect his identity) who had read how I was treated by these individual's at the IAM.

Ciro Di Donna/Italian American Surrealist Queens, N. Y.

Ciro, Thank you for having the courage to speak up against this fraud of a museum. They raise money for this charity but the deed does not have the Museum in the deed or any mention of the Museum - only three individuals. And this was after Sen. Maltese gave them over a million dollars last summer as his going away gift.

Name of Individual/Withheld